Economic & Trade Policy
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A PROCLAMATION 1. In Proclamation 11048 of July 20, 2026 (Imposing Additional Duties To Offset Canadian Discrimination Against the Commerce of the United States With Respect to Motor Vehicles), I found as a fact that Canada is discriminating in fact against the commerce of the United States through Canada’s motor vehicle tariff scheme; that this discrimination places the commerce of the United States at a disadvantage compared to the commerce of other countries; and that Canada’s imposition is unreasonable, is not equally enforced upon the like articles of every foreign country, and places a burden on the commerce of the United States. To offset the burden or disadvantage on U.S. commerce from Canada’s discrimination or unreasonable and unequal imposition on U.S. auto and auto parts exports, I imposed under section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1338) (section 338) additional ad valorem duties, effective August 19, 2026, on certain products of Canada. 2. In Proclamation 11056 of August 18, 2026 (Temporary Suspension of Additional Duties To Offset Canadian Discrimination Against the Commerce of the United States With Respect to Alcoholic Beverages, Dairy, and Motor Vehicles), I temporarily suspended for 3 days the effective date of the additional ad valorem duties imposed under Proclamation 11048 after Canada expressed a commitment to remove the discrimination or unreasonable and unequal imposition at issue in Proclamation 11048. 3. On August 21, 2026, Canada reneged on its commitment, ceased negotiating in good faith, and did not remove the discrimination or unreasonable and unequal imposition at issue in Proclamation 11048. 4. Accordingly, at 12:01 a.m. eastern time on August 22, 2026, the 3-day suspension imposed by Proclamation 11056 lapsed, and the additional ad valorem duties imposed under Proclamation 11048 became effective. 5. I have received certain information, opinions, and recommendations from senior executive branch officials on the status of the circumstances involved in Proclamation 11048 and the effect of the additional ad valorem duties imposed in Proclamation 11048, including how effectively those duties are offsetting the burden or disadvantage on U.S. commerce. According to senior executive branch officials, although the additional ad valorem duties imposed in Proclamation 11048 offset the burden or disadvantage on U.S. commerce, modifying the scope of products subject to the additional ad valorem duties imposed in Proclamation 11048 would still offset the burden or disadvantage on U.S. commerce and better serve the public interest. In my senior executive branch officials’ opinion, modifying the scope of products subject to the additional ad valorem duties imposed in Proclamation 11048 is required by the public interests and is consistent with the interests of the United States. 6. After considering the information, opinions, and recommendations that have been provided to me by senior executive branch officials, among other relevant information and considerations, I determine that the public interests require modifying the scope of products subject to the additional ad valorem duties imposed in Proclamation 11048. 7. In my judgment, the modification in this proclamation will offset the burden or disadvantage on U.S. commerce, is consistent with the public interests and the interests of the United States, is required by the public interests, and will better serve the public interest. 8. Section 338 authorizes the President, if he determines it will serve the public interest, to offset any burden or disadvantage placed on the commerce of the United States by an unequal imposition or discrimination by a foreign country by specifying and declaring additional duties not to exceed 50 percent ad valorem (or its equivalent) and not to take effect earlier than 30 days after the President’s proclamation finding that a foreign country is imposing an unreasonable charge, exaction, regulation, or limitation that is not equally enforced on the like articles of every foreign country, or discriminates in fact against U.S. commerce in a way that places the commerce of the United States at a disadvantage compared to the commerce of any foreign country. Section 338 also authorizes the President to suspend, revoke, supplement, or amend any proclamation under section 338 whenever the President deems that the public interests require such action. Further, section 338 authorizes the President to exclude from importation articles of the foreign country if the foreign country maintains or increases the discrimination against the commerce of the United States and the President deems the exclusion to be consistent with the public interests and the interests of the United States. 9. Section 604 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2483) (section 604), authorizes the President to embody in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) the substance of statutes affecting import treatment, and actions thereunder, including the removal, modification, continuance, or imposition of any rate of duty or other import restriction. NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 338; section 301 of title 3, United States Code; and section 604, do hereby proclaim as follows: (1) Except as otherwise provided in this proclamation, certain products of Canada, as set forth in Annex I, Part A to this proclamation, imported into the United States shall be subject to the additional ad valorem duty of 50 percent imposed pursuant to Proclamation 11048. In addition, certain products of Canada, as set forth in Annex I, Part B to this proclamation, imported into the United States shall no longer be subject to the additional ad valorem duty of 50 percent imposed pursuant to Proclamation 11048. The duties imposed pursuant to Proclamation 11048, as modified in this proclamation, shall apply in addition to duties imposed pursuant to section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1862). These changes shall be effective with respect to goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern time on September 15, 2026. (2) The HTSUS is modified as provided in Annex II to this proclamation, effective with respect to goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern time on September 15, 2026, and the modifications shall continue in effect unless this action is expressly suspended, revoked, supplemented, amended, or terminated. (3) The head of each executive department and agency (agency) is authorized to and shall take all appropriate measures within the agency’s authority to implement this proclamation. The head of each agency may, consistent with applicable law, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, redelegate the authority to take such appropriate measures within the agency. (4) The Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, and the United States Trade Representative, is authorized to issue such rules, regulations, guidance, instructions, or determinations as may be necessary to implement this proclamation and is authorized to take any necessary measures to administer this proclamation. (5) The Commissioner of CBP, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, the United States Trade Representative, the Chairman of the United States International Trade Commission, and any other senior executive branch official he deems appropriate, shall determine whether any additional modifications to the HTSUS are necessary to effectuate this proclamation and shall make such modifications to the HTSUS through notice in the Federal Register, including any technical or ministerial correction to the annexes to this proclamation. (6) For any rule or regulation the Commissioner of CBP makes to implement this proclamation, the Commissioner of CBP shall, to the extent required by law, obtain the approval of the President or the United States Trade Representative. The United States Trade Representative is delegated the President’s approval authority in 19 U.S.C. 1338(h). (7) Any provision of previous proclamations and Executive Orders that is inconsistent with this proclamation is superseded to the extent of such inconsistency. (8) If any provision of this proclamation or the application of any provision to any individual or circumstance is held to be invalid, the remainder of this proclamation and the application of its provisions to any other individuals or circumstances shall not be affected. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighth day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and fifty-first. ANNEX I ANNEX II DONALD J. TRUMP Notifications URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/09/modifying-the-scope-of-products-of-canada-subject-to-the-additional-duties-imposed-to-offset-canadian-discrimination-against-the-united-states-with-respect-to-motor-vehicles/
What is the Presidential Action, explain the Purpose in layman’s terms in 10 lines.
This proclamation modifies the list of Canadian products subject to a 50% tariff imposed to counteract unfair Canadian tariffs on U.S. motor vehicles and parts. The tariffs aim to protect U.S. businesses from discriminatory trade practices that put American products at a disadvantage. After Canada failed to honor its commitment to address these issues, the U.S. reinstated and adjusted the tariffs to better serve American interests. The action seeks to ensure fair trade between the two countries and support the U.S. auto industry. The tariffs will take effect starting September 15, 2026. Federal agencies are directed to enforce these changes. This measure is intended to pressure Canada to remove discriminatory tariffs and level the playing field for U.S. exporters.
What are the Actions Directed to Agencies (Also identify which agencies) by this executive order. Explain in 10-15 lines
The proclamation directs the heads of all executive departments and agencies to take all appropriate actions within their authority to implement the tariff modifications. Specifically, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is authorized to issue rules, regulations, guidance, and instructions necessary to enforce the proclamation. CBP will work in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, Secretary of Commerce, and the United States Trade Representative (USTR). The Commissioner of CBP, along with the Chairman of the U.S. International Trade Commission and other senior officials, will determine if further modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) are needed and will publish such changes in the Federal Register. Any regulatory actions by CBP require approval from the President or the USTR, who holds delegated authority. Agencies may also redelegate authority as needed to ensure effective implementation.
Are there any deadlines written in this executive order, and if so, what they are in 5 lines.
The modified additional duties will apply to goods entered for consumption or withdrawn from warehouse on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern time on September 15, 2026. The proclamation took effect immediately upon signing on September 8, 2026, but the tariff changes have this specified effective date. The 3-day suspension of duties previously imposed expired on August 22, 2026, reinstating the original tariffs. Future modifications to the HTSUS will be announced as necessary.
What will be the impact on citizens, states, federal agencies, businesses for this executive order. Explain in detail in 20 lines
This proclamation will impact U.S. businesses, particularly those involved in the automotive sector, by imposing higher tariffs on certain Canadian imports, making those goods more expensive. U.S. auto manufacturers and parts suppliers may benefit from reduced competition due to the tariffs, potentially improving domestic sales and protecting jobs. However, American consumers could face higher prices on vehicles and parts due to increased costs passed along the supply chain. States with significant automotive industries, such as Michigan and Ohio, might see economic benefits, while states reliant on cross-border trade could experience disruptions. Federal agencies, including CBP, Treasury, Commerce, and USTR, will need to allocate resources to enforce and monitor the tariffs, potentially increasing administrative workload and costs. The tariffs may also strain U.S.-Canada trade relations, affecting other sectors beyond automotive. Businesses importing Canadian goods will need to adjust their sourcing and pricing strategies. The proclamation signals a firm stance on trade fairness, potentially encouraging Canada to negotiate more equitable terms. However, retaliatory measures from Canada could impact other U.S. industries. Overall, the action aims to protect American economic interests but may have mixed effects on prices and trade dynamics.
Are there any budget or funding directions through this executive order.
The proclamation does not specify any new budget or funding allocations. It authorizes existing agencies to use their current resources to implement and enforce the tariff modifications. Any additional costs incurred by agencies would be managed within their existing budgets or through standard appropriations processes.
What is the political context of this executive order in 5-10 lines.
This proclamation arises amid ongoing trade tensions between the U.S. and Canada, particularly concerning tariffs on motor vehicles and related products. It reflects the Trump administration’s broader trade policy approach focused on protecting American industries from perceived unfair foreign trade practices. The action follows Canada’s failure to uphold commitments to remove discriminatory tariffs, prompting the U.S. to reassert its tariff measures. This move aligns with a nationalist economic stance emphasizing “America First” principles. It also signals to international trading partners the U.S. willingness to use executive authority to address trade imbalances. The proclamation may influence future U.S.-Canada negotiations and broader North American trade relations.
What are the short term and long term effects of this executive order and what should be monitored in terms of impact in 20-25 lines.
In the short term, the proclamation will increase costs for Canadian imports subject to the tariffs, potentially reducing their competitiveness in the U.S. market. This could lead to increased sales for U.S. domestic manufacturers in the affected sectors, particularly automotive and parts suppliers. However, consumers may face higher prices on vehicles and related products. Federal agencies will need to monitor compliance and enforcement effectiveness. Trade tensions may escalate, with possible retaliatory tariffs from Canada affecting other sectors. In the long term, the proclamation could incentivize Canada to revise its tariff policies, fostering fairer trade conditions. It may encourage U.S. businesses to diversify supply chains to reduce dependence on Canadian imports. The tariffs could also lead to structural changes in the North American automotive industry, influencing investment and production decisions. However, prolonged tariffs risk harming bilateral relations and disrupting integrated supply chains, potentially reducing overall economic efficiency. Monitoring should focus on economic indicators such as trade balances, industry employment, consumer prices, and bilateral negotiation progress. The impact on U.S. manufacturing competitiveness and any retaliatory trade measures by Canada or other countries must be assessed. Additionally, the effectiveness of the tariff adjustments in offsetting the burden on U.S. commerce should be evaluated regularly. The administration should watch for unintended consequences, including supply chain disruptions or inflationary pressures.
What are the criticisms or risks that need to be monitored in 15-20 lines.
Critics may argue that the tariffs could provoke a trade war, escalating tensions and harming both U.S. and Canadian economies. Higher tariffs risk increasing costs for American consumers and businesses reliant on Canadian imports, potentially leading to inflation in affected sectors. There is also a risk of retaliation by Canada, which could impose tariffs on U.S. exports, impacting other industries and jobs. The proclamation could disrupt integrated supply chains in the automotive sector, reducing efficiency and competitiveness. Some may view the executive action as heavy-handed, bypassing legislative trade authority and potentially violating international trade agreements. The impact on diplomatic relations and broader North American trade cooperation must be carefully monitored. Additionally, the effectiveness of tariffs in achieving long-term trade fairness is uncertain and could lead to unintended economic consequences. Monitoring is needed to ensure that the tariffs do not disproportionately harm certain regions or sectors within the U.S. economy.
Are there any past precedents of this executive order by previous presidents or by the judicial court, which could support or not support the validity in 10-15 lines.
Previous presidents have used Section 301 and Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to impose tariffs addressing unfair trade practices, including during the Trump administration’s earlier trade disputes with China and other countries. Proclamations imposing additional duties to offset discriminatory foreign tariffs have been upheld as valid exercises of executive authority under U.S. trade law. The use of tariffs as a tool to counteract foreign discrimination is well-established, and courts have generally deferred to the executive branch’s determinations in this area. However, judicial challenges have occasionally arisen concerning the scope and application of such tariffs, particularly regarding procedural requirements and international trade commitments. The current proclamation follows this precedent by citing statutory authority and providing findings to justify the tariffs.
What is the Presidential Action, explain the Purpose in layman’s terms in 10 lines.
This proclamation modifies the list of Canadian products subject to a 50% tariff imposed to counteract unfair Canadian tariffs on U.S. motor vehicles and parts. The tariffs aim to protect U.S. businesses from discriminatory trade practices that put American products at a disadvantage. After Canada failed to honor its commitment to address these issues, the U.S. reinstated and adjusted the tariffs to better serve American interests. The action seeks to ensure fair trade between the two countries and support the U.S. auto industry. The tariffs will take effect starting September 15, 2026. Federal agencies are directed to enforce these changes. This measure is intended to pressure Canada to remove discriminatory tariffs and level the playing field for U.S. exporters.
What are the Actions Directed to Agencies (Also identify which agencies) by this executive order. Explain in 10-15 lines
The proclamation directs the heads of all executive departments and agencies to take all appropriate actions within their authority to implement the tariff modifications. Specifically, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is authorized to issue rules, regulations, guidance, and instructions necessary to enforce the proclamation. CBP will work in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, Secretary of Commerce, and the United States Trade Representative (USTR). The Commissioner of CBP, along with the Chairman of the U.S. International Trade Commission and other senior officials, will determine if further modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS
About the Author
